34 virus scanners tested (翻譯)

字體: | 打印

(荷蘭文-->使用Google翻譯成英文)

G-Data, Avira, F-Secure and Norton top!!!
  

Maandag, 14:32 door Redactie Reacties: 14

Monday, 14:32 by Editors Comments: 14



Now the first "2009 Internet Security Suites" appear, the German testorgaan AV-Test 34 virus scanners tested. Besides well-known tests with more than 1 million infected and 2.5 million files clean, we also looked into the performance of the scanner and the speed with which updates available. According to Andreas Marx, director of AV-Test, consumers should not just look at the detection score. "This gives the user a limited and misleading picture of what the product can. Only when all the aspects together you can get to a good view. So good heuristics and response times just as important."

Marx advises not to choose a new scanner as the current version has some limitations. Scoort a scanner to detect low rootkits, then it might be wiser to a specialized anti-rootkit product to buy, says the virustester. "A suit of an integrated security provider may be most convenient for users who currently have no anti-virus tool or a new purchase because of the current license expires."

For testing the detectiegraad used AV-Test 1.1 million copies and there were no "historic" between copies. Many anti-virusbedrijven stop detection of certain old malware to their database to handle it. Of the 34 scanners knew only 6 less than 85% of the malware to recognize. In addition to the malware virus scanners were also tested with a collection of 95,000 copies spyware and adware. The detection of spyware by free virus scanners, such as those of AntiVir and AVG is very restrictive, and is below the 15%. In summary therefore the commercial versions.

This time was also looked at the time that anti-virusbedrijven need to present an update on the matter. That would be able within two hours. At CA know after each anti-virusbedrijf within the eight one update to distribute. In the following summary, we have a "total" added table where the points of each virus we have together. Since three products come out top. Symantec Norton Internet Security 2009, Avira Premium Security Suite 2008, G Data Internet Security 2009, F-Secure Internet Security 2009 and Webwasher Gateway 6 knew each 28 points. Webwasher and G Dates are multi-engine scanners, which Webwasher those of Avira and himself. G Data used last year that Avast and Kaspersky, but has now switched to that of Avast and BitDefender, which leads to better performance.


Update: Title adjusted, F-Secure and Avira added
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
看來Norton打算在2009偵測率大爆炸...
GDATA 2009 偵測率並沒有因為AVP被換掉而降低

原文 : http://security.nl/artikel/22931/1&usg=ALkJrhiC1BEHQSQWspf0LonIRCZ34JL-aA

[ 本帖最後由 ㄚ一 於 2008-9-3 14:06 編輯 ]

我也來說兩句 查看全部評論 相關評論

  • jlin (2008-9-03 12:05:43)

    wow..... 我用的趨勢怎麼排名這麼後面.難道要丟進垃圾桶了?
  • megakotaro (2008-9-03 12:08:18)

    QUOTE:

    原帖由 jlin 於 2008-9-3 12:05 發表
    wow..... 我用的趨勢怎麼排名這麼後面.難道要丟進垃圾桶了?
    還好啊......至少不是「十三」的那個
    這是照英文字母排的,你會不會看錯了?

    [ 本帖最後由 megakotaro 於 2008-9-3 12:10 編輯 ]
  • shark1122tw (2008-9-03 12:24:36)

    QUOTE:

    原帖由 jlin 於 2008-9-3 12:05 發表
    wow..... 我用的趨勢怎麼排名這麼後面.難道要丟進垃圾桶了?
    輸給他的竟然只有十家不到
    難怪趨勢的總裁(?)要說她們欺騙消費者數十年.....
  • ㄚ一 (2008-9-03 13:50:48)

    很明顯該篇是沒有經過翻譯的..還是荷蘭文..
    這個其實是AV-TEST做的測試
  • 000110 (2008-9-03 14:13:12)

    測試類別由左至右, 依次為
    1. 惡意軟體的偵測率
    2. 間諜軟體的偵測率
    3. 誤判
    4. 效能 (掃瞄速度)
    5. 主動防禦對未知惡意軟體的偵測率
    6. 新惡意軟體的反應
    7. 總計
  • integear (2008-9-03 18:49:12)

    QUOTE:

    原帖由 megakotaro 於 2008-9-3 12:08 發表

    還好啊......至少不是「十三」的那個
    這是照英文字母排的,你會不會看錯了?
    個人認為不需要看不起CA,CA潛力不比Symantec低 .

    在下只能說是CA自己不想好好做,CEO該換人了 .
  • skywalker (2008-9-03 20:10:54)

    嗯,我鄭在用的gdis2009,除了在指定掃瞄目錄一開始啟動時會延遲幾秒,在掃kavo168那個檔時確實是飛快的!一點都不像gdis的作風 ,但如果開啟webfilter的話,真的會慢許多,它會一直讀網頁資料,圖檔多的網頁會慢很多,尤其是我的老電腦,但不啟動webfilter真的是比小紅傘慢一些些而已(個人覺得比mcafee快很多)
    1. 惡意軟體的偵測率                            5
    2. 間諜軟體的偵測率                            5
    3. 誤判                                                    4
    4. 效能 (掃瞄速度)                                4
    5. 主動防禦對未知惡意軟體的偵測率5
    6. 新惡意軟體的反應                            5
    7. 總計                                                  28
  • anan9000 (2008-9-04 00:03:58)

    沒想到AMD防毒~分數還不差耶....真的是不能小看....
  • kingyeh (2008-9-04 00:20:02)

    QUOTE:

    原帖由 shark1122tw 於 2008-9-3 12:24 發表

    輸給他的竟然只有十家不到
    難怪趨勢的總裁(?)要說她們欺騙消費者數十年.....
    2009還沒出來,應該還有機會~不過還是要罵....
  • 天氣預報 (2008-9-04 01:54:00)

    應該公開NIS 2009的build
    如果是120就太屌了